
INSTRUCTIONS: You will have 2 hours to complete the exam.
There are 8 questions worth a total of 150 points. Not all questions
have the same point value so gauge your time appropriately. Read the
questions carefully and completely. Answer each question and show
work in the space provided on the exam. Turn in the entire exam
when you are done or when time is up. For essay questions, think
before you write.
- [15 pts] A supplier ships lot of 10,000 parts to a
customer. The customer randomly samples 100 parts and tests them
destructively, once tested the part is destroyed and cannot be
tested again.
- (a) [3] Is the customer sampling with or without
replacement? Explain your choice briefly.
- (b) [5] The customer will accept the lot if there are
5 or fewer defective parts in the random sample
of 100. Assuming that there are 1000 defective parts
in the lot, write out, in terms of a probability function,
the probability that the customer accepts the lot. Do not attempt to calculate this probability.
- (c) [5] If in a sample of 100, 4 defective parts are
found, give an approximate 95%confidence interval on
the number of defective parts in the lot.
- (d) [2] Again assuming that there are 1000 defective
parts in the lot, if 100 parts are removed and 4 are
found to be defective, what is the chance that the next
part chosen will be defective?
- [25 pts] In a previous STAT 495 class, one team looked at
the production of a plastic agitator for a washing machine. The part
was made using gas-assisted injection molding. The critical quality
characteristic measured was the weight of the agitator. The target
weight was 0.515 with a lower specification limit of 0.505 and an
upper specification limit of 0.525. Below is Minitab output on the
process stability and capability for 50 subgroups of size 5. The
estimate of process standard deviation is based on
.
- (a) [8] Comment on the process. Describe any trends and
interpret appropriate summary statistics.
- (b) [3] Upon further investigation it was discovered that
subgroups 1-25 came from the first cavity of the injection
mold and subgroups 26-50 came from the second cavity.
Which of the Magnificent Seven tools would be most helpful
for further examination of the process? Explain briefly.
- (c) [8] Below is Minitab output on the process stability
and capability for the second cavity. Again the estimate
of process standard deviation is based on
.
Comment on the process. Describe any trends and interpret
appropriate summary statistics.
- (d) [6] Continuing with the examination of the second
cavity, what is the value of the process potential,
? What does this tell you about the process?
- [20 pts] Perhaps the major concept explored in STAT 495
is the idea of variation and how variation can be quantified. Pick
two statistical techniques from this course and briefly discuss
how the quantification of variation is central to the technique. Caution: Control charts count as only one technique. Use only the
space below.
- [30 pts] Plastic viscosity is an important
characteristic of a lubricant used to reduce friction between a
rotating shaft and the casing that surrounds it. Measurements of
plastic viscosity were taken on two lubricants. Three batches of each
lubricant were used in the tests, with four samples of fluid taken
from each batch. Below are the data.

- (a) [15] Complete the following analysis of variance table.

- (b) [10] From the analysis of variance table in (a), compute
variance components for the three sources of variation.
Express these as a percentage. Which source is the
largest contributer to the variation in the plastic
viscosity measurements?
- (c) [5] Is there more variability from batch to batch within
a lubricant or from sample to sample within a batch?
Justify your answer by referring to part (b) above.
- [20 pts] Robert Adams (GM-Delphi, Warren) looked at the
process of locating and drilling the rear adjuster floor support
clearance holes in a vehicle for his STAT 495 project. The quality
characteristic was the deviation from the nominal (target) distance.
The target deviation was zero with tolerances of
. The
deviation was found to be stable and predictable over time using
standard control charts. The following capability indices were then
calculated.
- (a) [4] Interpret the value of the process potential.
What does this tell you about the process?
- (b) [4] Interpret the difference between the value of
the process potential and the process capability.
What does this tell you about the process?
- (c) [5] Assuming that individual deviations follow a
normal distribution, approximately what percentage of
deviations would you expect to see above the upper
specification limit?
- (d) [6] Assuming that the capability indices were
calculated using
and
,
what are the values of
and
?
- [10 pts] A supplier ships parts in lots of 1000. Your
acceptance sampling scheme is to accept the lot if there are 0 or 1
defective parts in a random sample of 10, sampling with replacement.
- (a) [6] If there are 25 defective parts in a lot, what is
the chance that the lot is accepted?
- (b) [4] Below is a table giving various different values
for the number of defective parts and the corresponding
probability of accepting such a lot based on the scheme
described above. According to the table what is 91.4%upper bound on the number of defective parts in a lot?

- [10 pts] Briefly, but completely, explain the difference
between a study with enumerative purposes and one with analytic
purposes. Use only the space below.
- [20 pts] Throughout the semester we have looked at
statistical tools and methods for building knowledge about products
and processes. Quality improvement is a process. Construct
a logical flow chart for the process of improving the quality of a
manufacturing/service process. Hint: It may help to think about your
team project for this course.