

Melon Plastic Mulch
The use of plastic mulch on muskmelon is a proven profitable practice in central Iowa. We consistently increase early yields (see Table 1).
Table 1. Effect of plastic mulch on yield of muskmelons,
cv. Burpee hybrid, Ames, Iowa, 1978 to 1982.
| Treatment | 1978 |
1979 |
1980 |
1982 |
1991 |
1992 |
Average |
Early yield, cwt/acre | |||||||
| Bare soil | 42 |
62 |
84 |
32 |
40 |
50 |
52 |
| Black plastic | 55 |
173 |
-- |
148 |
78 |
113 |
113 |
| Clear plastic | 167 |
227 |
383 |
155 |
118 |
175 |
204 |
Total yield, cwt/acre | |||||||
| Bare soil | 217 |
434 |
441 |
188 |
399 |
237 |
319 |
| Blackplastic | 293 |
478 |
--- |
250 |
475 |
351 |
369 |
| Clear plastic | 269 |
535 |
592 |
273 |
427 |
334 |
405 |
| NOTE: | Transplants were set early part of May and early harvest was late July to early August. Total yield to first week of September. Soil type = fine, sandy loam; well drained. | ||||||
Weed control with clear plastic is important. Obtain a copy of FG-600, titled "Midwest Vegetable Production Guide for Commercial Growers," from your local county extension office or Ag Publication Distribution, 112 Printing and Publications Building, Ames, Iowa 50011, for recommended herbicides. The new IRT mulches perform equivalent to clear plastic and are worthy of trial. They are green in color and allow light radiation of long wavelengths through to warm the soil, but block light wavelengths needed for plant growth. Thus, an herbicide would be needed with IRT mulch and the row middles could be kept weed free by mechanical means.
For the spring of 1990, a cool, wet spring, the average 4-inch bare soil minimum temperature was 52 degrees F from May 15 to 31 (Table 2). The 4-inch minimum soil temperature under clear plastic was 57 degrees F and the IRT 76 plastic 58 degrees F. Similar results were found in 1992. The major weed species were redroot pigweed, purslane, chickweed, lambsquarter, foxtail, crabgrass, and smartweed. For the most part, IRT 76 plastic was weed free. However, where there was a heavy chickweed infestation and some did grow under the IRT 76 mulch. See row cover section below for yeild information with IRT 76 compared with clear plastic.
Table 2. Soil temperatures, degrees F, under various mulch types with muskmelon, cv. Gold Star, Ames, Iowa, 1990 and 1992.
| Material | Minimum degrees F |
Plant Survival, % | ||
1990 |
1992 |
1990 |
1992 | |
| Bare ground | 52c1) |
55c |
7b |
64c |
| Black plastic | 55b |
57b |
22a |
86a |
| Clear plastic | 57a |
59a |
59a |
93a |
| IRT 76 plastic | 58a |
58a |
67a |
79b |
| 1)Numbers followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different, DMRT, 5% level. Thermocouples (3/treatment) were placed to the side of the transplant (about 3 inches) just under the plastic. | ||||
Table 3. Effect of black plastic mulch on yield of muskmelons, cv. Burbee hybrid or Gold Star, Muscatine, Iowa, 1978-1983.
| Year | Early, cwt/acre |
Total, cwt/acre | ||
Bare Soil |
Black Plastic |
Bare Soil |
Black Plastic | |
| 1978 | 29 |
72 |
156 |
177 |
| 1979 | 94 |
124 |
204 |
208 |
| 1982 | 40 |
190 |
184 |
247 |
| 1983 | 32 |
54 |
163 |
193 |
| Average | 77 |
110 |
177 |
209 |
| NOTE: | Transplants were set mid-May and early harvest from July 23 to August 1, total yield to mid-August. Soil type = coarse, loamy sand; excessive drainage. | |||

On the two basic row cover types, wire-hoop supported and floating row covers, the floating row cover has not been successful under most central Iowa conditions because of wind (Table 4).
Table 4. Effect of floating row cover on early muskmelon,
cv. Gold Star, yield, Ames, 1983-84. No windbreaks, sandy loam soil.
| Plant Cover | No. / Plot |
Cwt / Acre |
1984 |
1983 | |
| None | 15 |
154 |
| Clear, slitted | 33 |
305 |
| Reemay | 9 |
160 |
| NOTE: All treatments grown with clear plastic mulch and trickle irrigation. | ||
Table 5. Effect of hoop supported, slitted, clear plastic
row covers on muskmelon, cv. Gold Star, early yield, Ames, Iowa, 1982-1992.1)
| Year | Plant Cover | |
None |
Clear, slitted | |
| 1984 (No./plot)2) | 15 |
33 |
Cwt / Acre | ||
| 1982 | 71 |
191 |
| 1983 | 154 |
305 |
| 1985 | 90 |
185 |
| 1987 | 68 |
138 |
| 1991 | 118 |
238 |
| 1992 | 175 |
390 |
| 6-year average | 113 |
237 |
| 1)All treatments grown with clear plastic mulch and trickle irrigation. 2)Hailed out on June 26. All fruit harvested on July 5. | ||
The constant abrasion of the material against the young transplants stunts growth, reducing early yield, very similar to the effect on tomatoes. The hoop-supported clear slitted plastic has always given an increase in early muskmelon production in central Iowa. Note the doubling of early yield in 1987 (Table 5) when May temperatures were the warmest on record (+5.5 degrees F above normal).
Clear plastic and IRT 76 tripled early yield compared with bare ground in 1991 and 1992 (Table 6). But top yields both years were from the combination of row cover with either clear plastic or IRT 76 mulch. Yield from clear plastic was superior to that from IRT 76 by 41 cwt/acre in 1991, but not in 1992. Crop rotation and herbicides were used to provide adequate weed control both years. Currently the extra cost of the IRT mulch does not justify its use unless weeds are a severe problem.
Table 6. Effect of plastic mulch type and slitted, hooped, clear plastic row covers on early and total marketable muskmelon, cv. Gold Star, early yield, Ames, Iowa, 1991-1992.
| Mulch Treatment | Early Marketable Yield1), cwt/acre | |
1991 |
1992 | |
| None | 40 |
50 |
| Clear Plastic (CP) | 118 |
175 |
| CP + Sl. Row Cover | 213 |
390 |
| IRT 76 (IRT) | 100 |
128 |
| IRT 76 + Sl. Row Cover | 149 |
367 |
| Comparison2) | ||
| None vs Rest | * |
** |
| RC vs No RC | ** |
** |
| CP vs IRT | * |
NS |
| 1)Early yields harvested during the first 10 days. 2)Contrasts calculated by partitioning the treatment effects using SAS general linear models procedure; *, **, NS contrasts significant, respectively. | ||
Where there is ample wind protection, a floating row cover will perform as well as a hoop-supported slitted clear plastic. Table 7 shows three years of data on the coarse, sandy soils on the Muscatine Island. Approximately 20-inch rye strips were left between each row. Under these conditions, the floating Reemay row cover performed as well as the hoop-supported slitted clear plastic.
Table 7. Effect of row covers on early muskmelon,
cv. Gold Star, yield, Muscatine, 1985-1987. Windbreak every row;
coarse, loamy sand soil.
| Plant Cover | Yield, cwt/acre -- 3-year average | ||
Early |
Total |
Fruit Size | |
| None | 57 |
218 |
4.1 |
| Clear, slitted | 82 |
217 |
4.2 |
| Reemay | 85 |
190 |
4.0 |
Combining clear plastic mulch and a row cover for early muskmelon production has great advantages. A basic disadvantage is that trickle irrigation must be used with this system on the coarse, sandy soils. Overhead irrigation does not penetrate the cover and reach the small root systems of the developing plants. This results in delayed maturity and sometimes even death.
............Justice for All
The Iowa Cooperative Extension Service's programs and policies are consistent with pertinent federal and state laws and regulations on nondiscrimination regarding race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, and handicap.
Cooperative Extension Service, Iowa State University of Science and Technology and the United States Department of Agriculture cooperating. Stanley R. Johnson, director, Ames, Iowa. Distributed in futherance of the Acts of Congress of May 8 and June 30, 1914.