Home
Class Slides
News Sites
Syllabus
WebCT
Downloads
Syllabus (PDF)
Office Hours
Tues., 2:10-4:10 pm & by appt.
|
These are three essays on political theory that are relevant
to international politics. Mingst refers to them, and you should read them.
I suggest that you print them out rather than read them on screen.
First, is a chapter from Thomas
Hobbes' Leviathan on the "state of nature."
Second, is a chapter from Rousseau's
"Discourse on the Origins of Inequality".
Third, is a link to Kant's Perpetual
Peace.
THE LEVIATHAN (1660)
by Thomas Hobbes
THE SECOND PART
CHAPTER XIII: OF THE NATURAL CONDITION OF MANKIND AS CONCERNING THEIR
FELICITY AND MISERY
NATURE hath made men so equal in the faculties of body and
mind as that, though there be found one man sometimes manifestly stronger in
body or of quicker mind than another, yet when all is reckoned together the
difference between man and man is not so considerable as that one man can
thereupon claim to himself any benefit to which another may not pretend as
well as he. For as to the strength of body, the weakest has strength enough
to kill the strongest, either by secret machination or by confederacy with
others that are in the same danger with himself.
And as to the faculties of the mind, setting aside the arts grounded upon
words, and especially that skill of proceeding upon general and infallible
rules, called science, which very few have and but in few things, as being
not a native faculty born with us, nor attained, as prudence, while we look
after somewhat else, I find yet a greater equality amongst men than that of
strength. For prudence is but experience, which equal time equally bestows
on all men in those things they equally apply themselves unto. That which
may perhaps make such equality incredible is but a vain conceit of one's own
wisdom, which almost all men think they have in a greater degree than the
vulgar; that is, than all men but themselves, and a few others, whom by
fame, or for concurring with themselves, they approve. For such is the
nature of men that howsoever they may acknowledge many others to be more
witty, or more eloquent or more learned, yet they will hardly believe there
be many so wise as themselves; for they see their own wit at hand, and other
men's at a distance. But this proveth rather that men are in that point
equal, than unequal. For there is not ordinarily a greater sign of the equal
distribution of anything than that every man is contented with his share.
From this equality of ability ariseth equality of hope in the attaining of
our ends. And therefore if any two men desire the same thing, which
nevertheless they cannot both enjoy, they become enemies; and in the way to
their end (which is principally their own conservation, and sometimes their
delectation only) endeavour to destroy or subdue one another. And from hence
it comes to pass that where an invader hath no more to fear than another
man's single power, if one plant, sow, build, or possess a convenient seat,
others may probably be expected to come prepared with forces united to
dispossess and deprive him, not only of the fruit of his labour, but also of
his life or liberty. And the invader again is in the like danger of another.
And from this diffidence of one another, there is no way for any man to
secure himself so reasonable as anticipation; that is, by force, or wiles,
to master the persons of all men he can so long till he see no other power
great enough to endanger him: and this is no more than his own conservation
requireth, and is generally allowed. Also, because there be some that,
taking pleasure in contemplating their own power in the acts of conquest,
which they pursue farther than their security requires, if others, that
otherwise would be glad to be at ease within modest bounds, should not by
invasion increase their power, they would not be able, long time, by
standing only on their defence, to subsist. And by consequence, such
augmentation of dominion over men being necessary to a man's conservation,
it ought to be allowed him.
Again, men have no pleasure (but on the contrary a great deal of grief) in
keeping company where there is no power able to overawe them all. For every
man looketh that his companion should value him at the same rate he sets
upon himself, and upon all signs of contempt or undervaluing naturally
endeavours, as far as he dares (which amongst them that have no common power
to keep them in quiet is far enough to make them destroy each other), to
extort a greater value from his contemners, by damage; and from others, by
the example.
So that in the nature of man, we find three principal causes of quarrel.
First, competition; secondly, diffidence; thirdly, glory.
The first maketh men invade for gain; the second, for safety; and the third,
for reputation. The first use violence, to make themselves masters of other
men's persons, wives, children, and cattle; the second, to defend them; the
third, for trifles, as a word, a smile, a different opinion, and any other
sign of undervalue, either direct in their persons or by reflection in their
kindred, their friends, their nation, their profession, or their name.
Hereby it is manifest that during the time men live without a common power
to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called war; and
such a war as is of every man against every man. For war consisteth not in
battle only, or the act of fighting, but in a tract of time, wherein the
will to contend by battle is sufficiently known: and therefore the notion of
time is to be considered in the nature of war, as it is in the nature of
weather. For as the nature of foul weather lieth not in a shower or two of
rain, but in an inclination thereto of many days together: so the nature of
war consisteth not in actual fighting, but in the known disposition thereto
during all the time there is no assurance to the contrary. All other time is
peace.
Whatsoever therefore is consequent to a time of war, where every man is
enemy to every man, the same consequent to the time wherein men live without
other security than what their own strength and their own invention shall
furnish them withal. In such condition there is no place for industry,
because the fruit thereof is uncertain: and consequently no culture of the
earth; no navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by
sea; no commodious building; no instruments of moving and removing such
things as require much force; no knowledge of the face of the earth; no
account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all,
continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary,
poor, nasty, brutish, and short.
It may seem strange to some man that has not well weighed these things that
Nature should thus dissociate and render men apt to invade and destroy one
another: and he may therefore, not trusting to this inference, made from the
passions, desire perhaps to have the same confirmed by experience. Let him
therefore consider with himself: when taking a journey, he arms himself and
seeks to go well accompanied; when going to sleep, he locks his doors; when
even in his house he locks his chests; and this when he knows there be laws
and public officers, armed, to revenge all injuries shall be done him; what
opinion he has of his fellow subjects, when he rides armed; of his fellow
citizens, when he locks his doors; and of his children, and servants, when
he locks his chests. Does he not there as much accuse mankind by his actions
as I do by my words? But neither of us accuse man's nature in it. The
desires, and other passions of man, are in themselves no sin. No more are
the actions that proceed from those passions till they know a law that
forbids them; which till laws be made they cannot know, nor can any law be
made till they have agreed upon the person that shall make it.
It may peradventure be thought there was never such a time nor condition of
war as this; and I believe it was never generally so, over all the world:
but there are many places where they live so now. For the savage people in
many places of America, except the government of small families, the concord
whereof dependeth on natural lust, have no government at all, and live at
this day in that brutish manner, as I said before. Howsoever, it may be
perceived what manner of life there would be, where there were no common
power to fear, by the manner of life which men that have formerly lived
under a peaceful government use to degenerate into a civil war.
But though there had never been any time wherein particular men were in a
condition of war one against another, yet in all times kings and persons of
sovereign authority, because of their independency, are in continual
jealousies, and in the state and posture of gladiators, having their weapons
pointing, and their eyes fixed on one another; that is, their forts,
garrisons, and guns upon the frontiers of their kingdoms, and continual
spies upon their neighbours, which is a posture of war. But because they
uphold thereby the industry of their subjects, there does not follow from it
that misery which accompanies the liberty of particular men.
To this war of every man against every man, this also is consequent; that
nothing can be unjust. The notions of right and wrong, justice and
injustice, have there no place. Where there is no common power, there is no
law; where no law, no injustice. Force and fraud are in war the two cardinal
virtues. Justice and injustice are none of the faculties neither of the body
nor mind. If they were, they might be in a man that were alone in the world,
as well as his senses and passions. They are qualities that relate to men in
society, not in solitude. It is consequent also to the same condition that
there be no propriety, no dominion, no mine and thine distinct; but only
that to be every man's that he can get, and for so long as he can keep it.
And thus much for the ill condition which man by mere nature is actually
placed in; though with a possibility to come out of it, consisting partly in
the passions, partly in his reason.
The passions that incline men to peace are: fear of death; desire of such
things as are necessary to commodious living; and a hope by their industry
to obtain them. And reason suggesteth convenient articles of peace upon
which men may be drawn to agreement. These articles are they which otherwise
are called the laws of nature, whereof I shall speak more particularly in
the two following chapters.
WHAT IS
THE ORIGIN OF INEQUALITY AMONG MEN, AND IS IT AUTHORISED BY NATURAL LAW?
Jean Jacques Rousseau (1754)
Translated by G. D. H. Cole, public domain
THE SECOND PART
THE first man who, having enclosed a piece of ground,
bethought himself of saying This is mine, and found people simple enough to
believe him, was the real founder of civil society. From how many crimes,
wars and murders, from how many horrors and misfortunes might not any one
have saved mankind, by pulling up the stakes, or filling up the ditch, and
crying to his fellows, "Beware of listening to this impostor; you are undone
if you once forget that the fruits of the earth belong to us all, and the
earth itself to nobody." But there is great probability that things had then
already come to such a pitch, that they could no longer continue as they
were; for the idea of property depends on many prior ideas, which could only
be acquired successively, and cannot have been formed all at once in the
human mind. Mankind must have made very considerable progress, and acquired
considerable knowledge and industry which they must also have transmitted
and increased from age to age, before they arrived at this last point of the
state of nature. Let us then go farther back, and endeavour to unify under a
single point of view that slow succession of events and discoveries in the
most natural order.
Man's first feeling was that of his own existence, and his first care that
of self-preservation. The produce of the earth furnished him with all he
needed, and instinct told him how to use it. Hunger and other appetites made
him at various times experience various modes of existence; and among these
was one which urged him to propagate his species — a blind propensity that,
having nothing to do with the heart, produced a merely animal act. The want
once gratified, the two sexes knew each other no more; and even the
offspring was nothing to its mother, as soon as it could do without her.
Such was the condition of infant man; the life of an animal limited at first
to mere sensations, and hardly profiting by the gifts nature bestowed on
him, much less capable of entertaining a thought of forcing anything from
her. But difficulties soon presented themselves, and it became necessary to
learn how to surmount them: the height of the trees, which prevented him
from gathering their fruits, the competition of other animals desirous of
the same fruits, and the ferocity of those who needed them for their own
preservation, all obliged him to apply himself to bodily exercises. He had
to be active, swift of foot, and vigorous in fight. Natural weapons, stones
and sticks, were easily found: he learnt to surmount the obstacles of
nature, to contend in case of necessity with other animals, and to dispute
for the means of subsistence even with other men, or to indemnify himself
for what he was forced to give up to a stronger.
In proportion as the human race grew more numerous, men's cares increased.
The difference of soils, climates and seasons, must have introduced some
differences into their manner of living. Barren years, long and sharp
winters, scorching summers which parched the fruits of the earth, must have
demanded a new industry. On the seashore and the banks of rivers, they
invented the hook and line, and became fishermen and eaters of fish. In the
forests they made bows and arrows, and became huntsmen and warriors. In cold
countries they clothed themselves with the skins of the beasts they had
slain. The lightning, a volcano, or some lucky chance acquainted them with
fire, a new resource against the rigours of winter: they next learned how to
preserve this element, then how to reproduce it, and finally how to prepare
with it the flesh of animals which before they had eaten raw.
This repeated relevance of various beings to himself, and one to another,
would naturally give rise in the human mind to the perceptions of certain
relations between them. Thus the relations which we denote by the terms,
great, small, strong, weak, swift, slow, fearful, bold, and the like, almost
insensibly compared at need, must have at length produced in him a kind of
reflection, or rather a mechanical prudence, which would indicate to him the
precautions most necessary to his security.
The new intelligence which resulted from this development increased his
superiority over other animals, by making him sensible of it. He would now
endeavour, therefore, to ensnare them, would play them a thousand tricks,
and though many of them might surpass him in swiftness or in strength, would
in time become the master of some and the scourge of others. Thus, the first
time he looked into himself, he felt the first emotion of pride; and, at a
time when he scarce knew how to distinguish the different orders of beings,
by looking upon his species as of the highest order, he prepared the way for
assuming pre-eminence as an individual.
Other men, it is true, were not then to him what they now are to us, and he
had no greater intercourse with them than with other animals; yet they were
not neglected in his observations. The conformities, which he would in time
discover between them, and between himself and his female, led him to judge
of others which were not then perceptible; and finding that they all behaved
as he himself would have done in like circumstances, he naturally inferred
that their manner of thinking and acting was altogether in conformity with
his own. This important truth, once deeply impressed on his mind, must have
induced him, from an intuitive feeling more certain and much more rapid than
any kind of reasoning, to pursue the rules of conduct, which he had best
observe towards them, for his own security and advantage.
Taught by experience that the love of well-being is the sole motive of human
actions, he found himself in a position to distinguish the few cases, in
which mutual interest might justify him in relying upon the assistance of
his fellows; and also the still fewer cases in which a conflict of interests
might give cause to suspect them. In the former case, he joined in the same
herd with them, or at most in some kind of loose association, that laid no
restraint on its members, and lasted no longer than the transitory occasion
that formed it. In the latter case, every one sought his own private
advantage, either by open force, if he thought himself strong enough, or by
address and cunning, if he felt himself the weaker.
In this manner, men may have insensibly acquired some gross ideas of mutual
undertakings, and of the advantages of fulfilling them: that is, just so far
as their present and apparent interest was concerned: for they were perfect
strangers to foresight, and were so far from troubling themselves about the
distant future, that they hardly thought of the morrow. If a deer was to be
taken, every one saw that, in order to succeed, he must abide faithfully by
his post: but if a hare happened to come within the reach of any one of
them, it is not to be doubted that he pursued it without scruple, and,
having seized his prey, cared very little, if by so doing he caused his
companions to miss theirs.
It is easy to understand that such intercourse would not require a language
much more refined than that of rooks or monkeys, who associate together for
much the same purpose. Inarticulate cries, plenty of gestures and some
imitative sounds, must have been for a long time the universal language; and
by the addition, in every country, of some conventional articulate sounds
(of which, as I have already intimated, the first institution is not too
easy to explain) particular languages were produced; but these were rude and
imperfect, and nearly such as are now to be found among some savage nations.
Hurried on by the rapidity of time, by the abundance of things I have to
say, and by the almost insensible progress of things in their beginnings, I
pass over in an instant a multitude of ages; for the slower the events were
in their succession, the more rapidly may they be described.
These first advances enabled men to make others with greater rapidity. In
proportion as they grew enlightened, they grew industrious. They ceased to
fall asleep under the first tree, or in the first cave that afforded them
shelter; they invented several kinds of implements of hard and sharp stones,
which they used to dig up the earth, and to cut wood; they then made huts
out of branches, and afterwards learnt to plaster them over with mud and
clay. This was the epoch of a first revolution, which established and
distinguished families, and introduced a kind of property, in itself the
source of a thousand quarrels and conflicts. As, however, the strongest were
probably the first to build themselves huts which they felt themselves able
to defend, it may be concluded that the weak found it much easier and safer
to imitate, than to attempt to dislodge them: and of those who were once
provided with huts, none could have any inducement to appropriate that of
his neighbour; not indeed so much because it did not belong to him, as
because it could be of no use, and he could not make himself master of it
without exposing himself to a desperate battle with the family which
occupied it.
The first expansions of the human heart were the effects of a novel
situation, which united husbands and wives, fathers and children, under one
roof. The habit of living together soon gave rise to the finest feelings
known to humanity, conjugal love and paternal affection. Every family became
a little society, the more united because liberty and reciprocal attachment
were the only bonds of its union. The sexes, whose manner of life had been
hitherto the same, began now to adopt different ways of living. The women
became more sedentary, and accustomed themselves to mind the hut and their
children, while the men went abroad in search of their common subsistence.
From living a softer life, both sexes also began to lose something of their
strength and ferocity: but, if individuals became to some extent less able
to encounter wild beasts separately, they found it, on the other hand,
easier to assemble and resist in common.
The simplicity and solitude of man's life in this new condition, the paucity
of his wants, and the implements he had invented to satisfy them, left him a
great deal of leisure, which he employed to furnish himself with many
conveniences unknown to his fathers: and this was the first yoke he
inadvertently imposed on himself, and the first source of the evils he
prepared for his descendants. For, besides continuing thus to enervate both
body and mind, these conveniences lost with use almost all their power to
please, and even degenerated into real needs, till the want of them became
far more disagreeable than the possession of them had been pleasant. Men
would have been unhappy at the loss of them, though the possession did not
make them happy.
We can here see a little better how the use of speech became established,
and insensibly improved in each family, and we may form a conjecture also
concerning the manner in which various causes may have extended and
accelerated the progress of language, by making it more and more necessary.
Floods or earthquakes surrounded inhabited districts with precipices or
waters: revolutions of the globe tore off portions from the continent, and
made them islands. It is readily seen that among men thus collected and
compelled to live together, a common idiom must have arisen much more easily
than among those who still wandered through the forests of the continent.
Thus it is very possible that after their first essays in navigation the
islanders brought over the use of speech to the continent: and it is at
least very probable that communities and languages were first established in
islands, and even came to perfection there before they were known on the
mainland.
Everything now begins to change its aspect. Men, who have up to now been
roving in the woods, by taking to a more settled manner of life, come
gradually together, form separate bodies, and at length in every country
arises a distinct nation, united in character and manners, not by
regulations or laws, but by uniformity of life and food, and the common
influence of climate. Permanent neighbourhood could not fail to produce, in
time, some connection between different families. Among young people of
opposite sexes, living in neighbouring huts, the transient commerce required
by nature soon led, through mutual intercourse, to another kind not less
agreeable, and more permanent. Men began now to take the difference between
objects into account, and to make comparisons; they acquired imperceptibly
the ideas of beauty and merit, which soon gave rise to feelings of
preference. In consequence of seeing each other often, they could not do
without seeing each other constantly. A tender and pleasant feeling
insinuated itself into their souls, and the least opposition turned it into
an impetuous fury: with love arose jealousy; discord triumphed, and human
blood was sacrificed to the gentlest of all passions.
Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch
Immanuel Kant (1795)
(Click on link above for the text)
|