2002 Annual Report
of the International Studies Quarterly Editors
Drafted on behalf of the ISQ editors by
Christopher L. Ball, Chief Editorial Assistant*
Editorial Team
Peter J. Dombrowski (Naval
Patrick James (
James McCormick (
Richard W. Mansbach (
1.
Editorial Staff at
The staff consists of seven individuals. Peter Dombrowski, Patrick James, Richard W. Mansbach, and James M. McCormick are the co-editors. Jim McCormick was the lead editor for 2002, and Peter Dombrowski will be lead editor for 2003.
The four co-editors are responsible for the content of each ISQ issue. They assign all peer reviewers and make all publication decisions. Each editor handles several primary and secondary “areas of expertise,” analogous to ISA sections. At least two editors share responsibility for most areas to prevent a large influx of submissions in any one area slowing the editorial process. The editors’ primary areas of expertise are:
Peter Dombrowski: International Political Economy; Comparative and Interdisciplinary Studies; Environmental Studies; Comparative Politics
Patrick James: Methodology and the Scientific Study of International Processes; Rational Choice and Formal Modeling
Richard W. Mansbach: International Politics
Theory; International Law; Ethnicity, Nationalism, and Migration; International
Organization; Identity Politics; Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
James M. McCormick: International Security and Peace Studies; Foreign Policy Analysis; Human Rights
The chief editorial assistant (CEA) oversees the daily operations of the journal and supervises the graduate student staff. The CEA also serves as the liaison between the editors and the authors, reviewers, and publishers. Kirsten L. Rafferty was the chief editorial assistant through June 2002; Christopher L. Ball succeeded her in mid-July 2002. Dan Christenson and Kristin Sherk are the current graduate editorial assistants. Kim Saak and Zhenya Hu were graduate editorial assistants earlier in the year.
2.
Submissions
Submissions rose from 180 in 2001 to 215 in 2002, an increase of 19.4%.
|
Submissions by Year |
||
|
Year |
# |
% change |
|
2002 |
215 |
19.4% |
|
2001 |
180 |
7.8% |
|
2000 |
167 |
16.8% |
|
1999 |
143 |
-7.7% |
|
1998 |
NA* |
NA |
|
1997 |
155 |
NA |
|
* 1998
data is incomplete due to the editorship transition |
||
As the following table (“First-Time Submissions by Subfield”) indicates, the subfields of international political economy (28), international political theory (21), and international security and peace studies (21) account for 47%of all submissions. [2]
|
First-Time Submissions by Subfield |
||||
|
2002
2001 |
||||
|
Field |
# |
% |
# |
% |
|
Comparative Interdisciplinary Studies |
7 |
4.7% |
2 |
1% |
|
Comparative Politics |
8 |
5.4% |
10 |
7% |
|
Environmental Studies |
3 |
2.0% |
1 |
1% |
|
Feminist Theory and Gender Studies |
3 |
2.0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Foreign Policy Analysis |
11 |
7.4% |
16 |
12% |
|
Human Rights |
6 |
4.0% |
NA |
NA |
|
Identity Politics |
4 |
2.7% |
2 |
1% |
|
International Law |
3 |
2.0% |
5 |
4% |
|
International Organization |
6 |
4.0% |
10 |
7% |
|
International Political Economy |
28 |
18.8% |
16 |
12% |
|
International Politics Theory |
21 |
14.1% |
32 |
24% |
|
International Security & Peace Studies |
21 |
14.1% |
12 |
9% |
|
Methodology and the Scientific Study of International Processes |
13 |
8.7% |
13 |
10% |
|
Rational Choice and Formal Modeling |
1 |
9.3% |
15 |
11% |
|
Other |
1 |
0.7% |
|
0% |
|
Total |
149 |
99.9% |
134 |
99% |
Of the 149 first-time submissions, 26% of the authors are
affiliated with institutions outside of the
|
International First-Time Submissions |
|
|
Authors affiliated with |
74% (111) |
|
Authors affiliated with non-U.S. institutions |
26% (38) |
|
|
|
|
Authors affiliated with US and Canadian institutions |
79% (118) |
In 2002, women authored 14% of submissions, men and women jointly authored 10%, and men authored 76%.
|
2002 Submissions by Gender |
||
|
|
2002 |
2001 |
|
% (#) |
% (#) |
|
|
Female |
14.4% (31) |
11.5% (21) |
|
Male |
75.8% (163) |
79.7% (145) |
|
Joint |
9.8% (21) |
8.8% (16) |
|
Total |
100% (215) |
100% (182) |
Examining the same data with the method used in 2001 and prior years, 20.4% of first-named authors were women, an increase from last year’s 14.4% level but only marginally ahead of the 20% first-named female authors in 2000 and 18.5% in 1990.
|
2002 Submissions by Gender (prior year format): |
||
|
|
First-Named Authors |
Co-authors |
|
|
%(#) |
%(#) |
|
Female |
20% (43) |
15.3% (13) |
|
Male |
80% (172) |
84.7% (72) |
1.
Acceptances
The acceptance rate rose from 14.9 % in 2001 to 17.7% in 2002. This compares to 14.9% in 2000, 11.7% in 1999, and 12.8% in 1997. The rejection rate rose to 50% from 46% in 2001 but on par with the 51% figure in 2000.
Invitations to revise and resubmit declined to 32% compared
with 40% in 2001 (and rose slightly compared to the 2000 rate of 31.2%). On the
advice of the ISQ editorial board, the editors have limited invitations to
revise and resubmit manuscripts to instances in which reviews clearly indicate
that a revised version is likely to be publishable. When revisions would
require a manuscript to be fundamentally re-written or entirely redesigned, the
editors generally reject the manuscript outright.
|
Decision |
Number |
Percent |
|
Accept |
38 |
17.7 |
|
Reject |
108 |
50.2 |
|
Revise and Resubmit |
69 |
32.1 |
|
Total |
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acceptances have been distributed across the following subfields:
|
Acceptances by Subfield |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
|
% (#) |
% (#) |
% (#) |
|
Comparative Interdisciplinary Studies |
0% (0) |
5% (1) |
0% (0) |
|
Comparative Politics |
2.5% (1) |
5% (1) |
4.3% (1) |
|
Environmental Studies |
0% (0) |
5% (1) |
0% (0) |
|
Feminist Theory and Gender Studies |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
13% (3) |
|
Foreign Policy Analysis |
2.5% (1) |
5% (1) |
13% (3) |
|
Identity Politics |
0% (0) |
5% (1) |
8.7% (2) |
|
International Political Economy |
16% (6) |
30% (6) |
8.7% (2) |
|
International Politics Theory |
30% (11) |
5% (1) |
4.3% (1) |
|
International Security and Peace Studies |
13.2% (5) |
10% (2) |