|
| |||||
|
PhotoColors A neo-pointillist art process using digitized photography and digital manipulation. | |||||
|
In the mid to late 1800's a brief,
but significant movement in Pointillism grew out of the impressionism movement which was
based, in its strictest sense, on the objective recording of nature in terms of
the effects of light and color. The post-impressionists broke with this
limited aim while retaining the brighter colors, freedom from
traditional subject matter and use of short brushstrokes and use of broken color.
Seurat , and Signac in particular,
embraced the use of the technique of broken color to form brighter,
more luminous colors. At the time, the mixing of pigments allowed a
limited range of color as too much pigment lead to muddy looking colors. Their technique placed small dots or strokes of color, often
contrasting, side by side. When viewed close up, the individual strokes were apparent.
When viewed from a distance, they blended into a dominant color.
The PhotoColor technique uses
this same, century old idea and adapts it to the technology
today using photographic and digital methods to capture and transform images.
| |||||
|
| |||||
Boneparte Pine by Singac
|
| | |||
|
Seurat, in his pre-photographic
time, was looking for a way to The tools of Seurat were limited, with the points of color being generated
by hand. Today, technology can help us take an existing image (a
photograph) and break it into raw, component colors in a dot pattern.
This scanning process forms a
digital database in the computer than can be easily manipulated.
A few of these manipulations are used in PhotoColors, including the
blurring of edges, exploding dots of color to form a watercolor feel,
lightening and darkening areas of the image and focusing attention through
lighting effects. In addition to these technical areas, composition can be
manipulated through addition and subtraction of elements, cropping
and resizing of elements. An extreme close-up of one
PhotoColor work shows the how the individual pixel areas are
exploded to small pools of color. Many of these color areas are not made
up of one individual color, but a range of colors that have been blurred
and modified.
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
Hiding Nuthatch by Joel Geske · 1997 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Extreme Close-up of Eye Detail | |||||||
|
Like Seurat and Signac the inspir-
ation in all my art lies in
nature and impressions it brings to me. While photographic in
some detail, much is not intended as a true record, but is manipulated to create
a feel and mood given the situation and circumstances of the scene.
The Redbreasted Nuthatch is a common winter bird in our area.
Here, warmer tones were used to highlight the warm tones of the bird
(compare with the cool winter tones of the Nuthatch preceding). Strong
lighting effects were added to give the feel of slanting light rays of winter
morning or evening.
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
Bloodroot by Joel Geske · 1996 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Redbreasted Nuthatch by Joel Geske · 1997 | |||||||
|
Seurat's and Signac's dissatisfac-
tion with what they regarded as
the formlessness and subjectivity of Impressionism led them to
the pointillist technique (which they called divisionism.)
His aim was to move away from the "muddy pigments"of the day
and provide a brighter look as seen in the sample
View of Fort Samson. His work brings together land and sky with
a luminous quality.
While the author's Prairie Fog
portrays a very different mood, it uses the luminous quality to
create an impression. Here, it was a bright winter day as we drove out to
a nearby prairie tract to hike. As we approached the area, a dense fog
bank moved in, blanketing the distant trees in fog. However, the prairie
grasses were still very vibrant in their color providing an odd warmth and
contrast to the cool winter fog.
The use of the computer allowed the photo to be manipulated and the
color and the luminosity of the grass areas to intensified. Again, the
pointillist technique is used and is especially obvious in the tree and fog forms.
(Much mre noticable in the larger original format of 11x17.)
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
|
View of Fort Samson , Grandcamp by Seurat | ||||||
|
| ||||||
Prairie Fog by Joel Geske · 1997 | ||||||
|
The technique to achieve the
PhotoColor look takes time and a number of steps.
Obviously, the process starts with a photo scanned into a computer.
I have found for my work that I can save at very low resolutions. Many
of the looser, more impressionistic pieces are started at 72 to 100 dots per inch.
In effect, I am letting the computer do what the neo-impressionists had to
do by handdivide or produce a small dot pattern. The fewer pixels
the computer has to work with, the looser the image and more impressionistic
it will be in the final form. As the artist, I need to determine how much detail
I want to retain. The photo is brought into Photoshop for modification.
Next, in a series of steps, I blur the photo, do considerable color
adjustments for shadows and color and run it through a watercolor filter
(now standard in Photoshop 4but when I started I needed Gallery Effects).
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
Canada Flight by Joel Geske · 1997 | |||||
|
In some cases, considerable man-
ipulation of the light and color takes place to create the desired impression.
Saguaro Sunrise is a good example. The photo was taken early in
the morning and I remember the hills being strikingly purple and misty
in the early morning light. The actual photo does not reflect this impression.
The final product adds considerable magenta to the hill area and by
using Photoshop's Render--Lighting Effects filter the light is adjusted to a
low angle coming from the left to give a morning feel that I recall.
My work continues to evolve to more impressionistic views. The
new Photoshop 4 provides even more filters and I am experimenting.
The example Campus Storm uses a photo of a campus landmark on a very
bright sunny day with a bright cloudless sky after a heavy snowfall. I created
the clouds and using the lighting effects filter created the more ominous
looking lighting. The intent was to suggest that although things appear sunny on the surface, recent
tensions on the campus are brewing beneath the surface and the dark
shadowy areas and uneasy feel created reflect the campus climate.
|
| ||||||
Saguaro Sunrise by Joel Geske · 1997 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Campus Storm by Joel Geske · 1998 | |||||||
|
Is it photography? Yes and no. Is it
painting? No and yes. While I don't physically have paints I
am paiting with the computer tools to mimic watercolor. It is both, and
yet no longer either. It is a new technique made possible by computer
and improved color printing technologies.
A new plotting printer on campus will print on canvas. The next step
is to take some of my images and using the oil painting filters or dry
brush filters modify the images to be printed on canvas. In fact, the
previous image, Campus Storm, used a dry brush filter instead of the
watercolor and will be tested on the canvas plotter.
People always ask "How did you
Little did Suerat and Signac dream a century ago that the small,
color-dot techniques they were experimenting with would be the basis for
modern printing. Now, it's a century later and everything old is new again.
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
Flight by Joel Geske · 1998 | |||||