Go to the first, previous, next, last section, table of contents.


Implementation

Gforth uses an extra locals stack. The most compelling reason for this is that the return stack is not float-aligned; using an extra stack also eliminates the problems and restrictions of using the return stack as locals stack. Like the other stacks, the locals stack grows toward lower addresses. A few primitives allow an efficient implementation:

@local#       -- w       gforth       ``fetch-local-number''

f@local#       -- r       gforth       ``f-fetch-local-number''

laddr#       -- c-addr       gforth       ``laddr-number''

lp+!#       --       gforth       ``lp-plus-store-number''

used with negative immediate values it allocates memory on the local stack, a positive immediate argument drops memory from the local stack

lp!       c-addr --       gforth       ``lp-store''

>l       w --       gforth       ``to-l''

f>l       r --       gforth       ``f-to-l''

In addition to these primitives, some specializations of these primitives for commonly occurring inline arguments are provided for efficiency reasons, e.g., @local0 as specialization of @local# for the inline argument 0. The following compiling words compile the right specialized version, or the general version, as appropriate:

compile-@local       n --         gforth       ``compile-fetch-local''

compile-f@local       n --         gforth       ``compile-f-fetch-local''

compile-lp+!       n --         gforth       ``compile-l-p-plus-store''

Combinations of conditional branches and lp+!# like ?branch-lp+!# (the locals pointer is only changed if the branch is taken) are provided for efficiency and correctness in loops.

A special area in the dictionary space is reserved for keeping the local variable names. { switches the dictionary pointer to this area and } switches it back and generates the locals initializing code. W: etc. are normal defining words. This special area is cleared at the start of every colon definition.

A special feature of Gforth's dictionary is used to implement the definition of locals without type specifiers: every wordlist (aka vocabulary) has its own methods for searching etc. (see section Wordlists). For the present purpose we defined a wordlist with a special search method: When it is searched for a word, it actually creates that word using W:. { changes the search order to first search the wordlist containing }, W: etc., and then the wordlist for defining locals without type specifiers.

The lifetime rules support a stack discipline within a colon definition: The lifetime of a local is either nested with other locals lifetimes or it does not overlap them.

At BEGIN, IF, and AHEAD no code for locals stack pointer manipulation is generated. Between control structure words locals definitions can push locals onto the locals stack. AGAIN is the simplest of the other three control flow words. It has to restore the locals stack depth of the corresponding BEGIN before branching. The code looks like this:

lp+!# current-locals-size - dest-locals-size
branch <begin>

UNTIL is a little more complicated: If it branches back, it must adjust the stack just like AGAIN. But if it falls through, the locals stack must not be changed. The compiler generates the following code:

?branch-lp+!# <begin> current-locals-size - dest-locals-size

The locals stack pointer is only adjusted if the branch is taken.

THEN can produce somewhat inefficient code:

lp+!# current-locals-size - orig-locals-size
<orig target>:
lp+!# orig-locals-size - new-locals-size

The second lp+!# adjusts the locals stack pointer from the level at the orig point to the level after the THEN. The first lp+!# adjusts the locals stack pointer from the current level to the level at the orig point, so the complete effect is an adjustment from the current level to the right level after the THEN.

In a conventional Forth implementation a dest control-flow stack entry is just the target address and an orig entry is just the address to be patched. Our locals implementation adds a wordlist to every orig or dest item. It is the list of locals visible (or assumed visible) at the point described by the entry. Our implementation also adds a tag to identify the kind of entry, in particular to differentiate between live and dead (reachable and unreachable) orig entries.

A few unusual operations have to be performed on locals wordlists:

common-list       list1 list2 -- list3         gforth-internal       ``common-list''

sub-list?       list1 list2 -- f         gforth-internal       ``sub-list?''

list-size       list -- u         gforth-internal       ``list-size''

Several features of our locals wordlist implementation make these operations easy to implement: The locals wordlists are organised as linked lists; the tails of these lists are shared, if the lists contain some of the same locals; and the address of a name is greater than the address of the names behind it in the list.

Another important implementation detail is the variable dead-code. It is used by BEGIN and THEN to determine if they can be reached directly or only through the branch that they resolve. dead-code is set by UNREACHABLE, AHEAD, EXIT etc., and cleared at the start of a colon definition, by BEGIN and usually by THEN.

Counted loops are similar to other loops in most respects, but LEAVE requires special attention: It performs basically the same service as AHEAD, but it does not create a control-flow stack entry. Therefore the information has to be stored elsewhere; traditionally, the information was stored in the target fields of the branches created by the LEAVEs, by organizing these fields into a linked list. Unfortunately, this clever trick does not provide enough space for storing our extended control flow information. Therefore, we introduce another stack, the leave stack. It contains the control-flow stack entries for all unresolved LEAVEs.

Local names are kept until the end of the colon definition, even if they are no longer visible in any control-flow path. In a few cases this may lead to increased space needs for the locals name area, but usually less than reclaiming this space would cost in code size.


Go to the first, previous, next, last section, table of contents.