Dr. Gabriel Rivera
Gabriel Rivera
NSF Postdoctoral Fellow
Ph.D., Clemson University
M.S., Old Dominion University
B.S., Old Dominion University
E-mail: grivera@iastate.edu
Link to CV
General Research Interests
My research is broadly grounded in the fields of evolutionary morphology
and biomechanics. More specifically, my interests focus on understanding
morphological variation, including the functional consequences of, and
the evolutionary mechanisms responsible for it. My current projects
focus on the role of aquatic flow velocity in generating intraspecific
differences in turtle shell morphology.
Turtles as a Model System for Studies of Flow
Semi-aquatic freshwater turtles represent an excellent novel system
in which to investigate the relationship between morphology and aquatic
flow regime for several reasons. First, as tetrapods, turtles represent
a phylogenetic lineage distinct from the osteichthyan fishes that have
been studied to date. Second, unlike fishes which live exclusively in
water and thus are maximally influenced by hydrodynamic characteristics
of their habitats, freshwater turtles use both aquatic and terrestrial
environments and thus have to balance pressures encountered in both
media. Third, because the shell limits axial mobility, propulsion in
turtles is limited to forces generated by movements of the limbs, which
results in a decoupling between the morphology of propulsory structures
and overall shape. In contrast, studies examining the association between
flow velocity and the morphology of fishes have to interpret the complex
interactions between modifications of the body and fins that reduce
drag and those that increase propulsion. Lastly, studies examining patterns
of intraspecific phenotypic variation across different flow regimes
in freshwater turtles have found that shells display habitat-associated
differences in morphology.
Current Projects
PROJECT 1: What are the relative effects of genetic and environmental
factors (i.e., flow) on morphology?
A major step toward understanding phenotypic diversification is quantifying
the importance of genetic divergence and phenotypic plasticity in producing
divergent morphologies. However, determining the relative importance
of these two sources of phenotypic variation on resultant phenotypes
requires an experimental design that addresses both simultaneously.
I am currently conducting a common-garden experiment in which I am raising
hatchling river cooters (Pseudemys concinna) from different parental
habitats (lentic and lotic) under different flow conditions for two
years. I will use changes in shell shape to examine the effects of genetic
and environmental factors on morphology. The results of this study will
be used to test two predictions based on the available information from
fishes, the current vertebrate model: (1) both genetic divergence and
phenotypic plasticity play a role in producing phenotypic differences
between flow regimes, and (2) genetic divergence plays a more important
role than plasticity in producing phenotypic differences between flow
regimes.
Project 2: To what extent does water flow drive repeatable and predictable
phenotypic divergence?
Parallel evolution is considered strong evidence for the process of
natural selection and is typically demonstrated by the production of
similar phenotypes under similar environmental conditions across multiple
independent lineages. In the southeastern United States, several physiographic
features (e.g., Appalachian Mountains and Apalachicola River) and historical
events (e.g., Pleistocene glaciation) have produced a major phylogeographic
discontinuity between the Atlantic and Gulf drainages that is repeated
in a wide range of taxa, including plants, mammals, amphibians, fishes,
and freshwater turtles. This discontinuity divides the range of Pseudemys
concinna into two phylogeographic lineages, those inhabiting Atlantic
drainages and those inhabiting Gulf drainages. This system provides
an excellent opportunity to test for patterns of repeated evolution
across flow regimes for several reasons: (1) both drainages possess
multiple lentic and lotic habitats, (2) I have identified patterns of
phenotypic variation between the two flow regimes within Gulf coast
drainages, and (3) preliminary evidence suggests that P. concinna within
Atlantic drainages also show phenotypic divergence between flow regimes.
I will be using shape data collected from turtles inhabiting multiple
pairs of connected lentic and lotic riverine sites to determine whether
the Atlantic and Gulf coast populations demonstrate the same morphological
patterns.
