Prologue: Yali's Question
"In the 13,000 years since the end of the last Ice Age, some parts of the world developed literate industrial societies with metal tools other parts developed only non-literate farming societies and still others retained societies of hunter-gatherers with stone tools. Those historical inequalities have cast long shadows on the modern world, because the literate societies with metal tools have conquered or exterminated the other societies."
Yali’s Question
Yali, a New Guinea politician asked " Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people had little cargo of our own?" To rephrase, "why did wealth and power become distributed as they now are, rather than in some other way? For instance, why weren't Native Americans, Africans, and Aboriginal Australians the ones who decimated, subjugated, or exterminated Europeans and Asians?
Common explanations
1) Racial or genetic superiority.
--No objective
evidence for this theory
2) Cold climate stimulates inventiveness
--But Europeans inherited
agriculture, wheels, writing, and metallurgy from warm climate peoples!
3) Lowland river valleys in dry climates depended on irrigation and thus required centralized bureaucracies
4) Guns, Infectious diseases, steel tools, manufactured
products
-- Yes, but these are the
immediate or proximal reasons.
-- Why did the Europeans
rather than Africans or Native Americans have these?
Chapter 1: Up to the Starting Point
Homo Erectus
Homo erectus (half the brain size of modern humans) evolved in Africa,
spread into Eurasia one million years ago.
Homo Sapiens
Homo Sapiens appeared about 100,000 years ago, with crude stone tools.
About 50,000 years ago the Great Leap Forward occurred with standardized
stone tools, jewelry.
Cro Magnons
Cro-Magnons moved into Europe 40,000 years ago.
Tools, needles, fishhooks, harpoons, bows and arrows, sewn clothing,
houses, carefully buried skeletons, art, hunting big prey. "Cro Magnons
somehow used their far superior technology, and their language skills or
brains, to infect, kill, or displace the Neanderthals [who had occupied
Europe previously] leaving behind little or no evidence of hybridization
between neanderthals and Cro-Magnons."
Neandertal

Spreading Out
40,000-30,000 years ago humans used watercraft to cross from Asia to
Indonesia to Australia and New Guinea.
This time period correlates to a massive extinction of large
game in those places.
Large Game in Eurasia
Diamond's theory is that large game survived in Eurasia because
humans took a million years to develop tools and become lethal predators
of large game, giving game time to adapt.
Spreading to the Americas
By 20,000 years ago, humans learned how to survive in Siberia.
This led to migration to Americas by 12,000 BC.
It took 1,000 years for humans to cover both N. and S. America.
Time period correlates to a massive extinction of large game in Americas:
Horses, lions, elephants, cheetahs, camels, and giant ground sloths.
Chapter 2: A Natural Experiment of History
In 1835, a seal hunting ship visiting the Chatham islands 500 miles off the coast of New Zealand brought the first news to New Zealand of islands where "there is an abundance of sea and shellfish; the lakes swarm with eels; and it is a land of the karaka berry...The inhabitants are very numerous, but they do not understand how to fight, and have no weapons".
Maori of New Zealand
Nine hundred of the native Maori people of New Zealand, armed
with guns, arrived in the Chatham Islands announcing that the Chatham Islands
people (the Moriori) were now their slaves, and killed those who objected.
Moriori Slaughter
An eyewitness account said "The Maori commenced to kill us like sheep...We
were terrified, fled to the bush, concealed ourselves in holes underground,
and in any place to escape our enemies. It was of no avail; we were discovered
and killed -- men, women, and children indiscriminately".
Maori Explanation
A Maori conqueror explained, "We took possession...in accordance with
our customs and we caught all the people. Not one escaped.
Some ran away from us, these we killed, and others we killed -- but what
of that? It was in accordance with our custom".
Natural History Experiment
This is a natural history experiment. Both the Maori and Moriori
descended from the same Polynesian farmers who settled New Zealand.
Moriori
But the Moriori, after moving to the Chatham islands hundreds
of years earlier could not farm due to the cold climate, and became hunter/gatherers.
They learned to live peacefully because their resources were so limited.
Maori
The New Zealand Maori continued farming, had dense populations,
more complex technology and political organization, and ferocious wars:
the difference was geography.
Polynesia
All the other Polynesian islands in the Pacific were populated
by the same stock of farming Polynesian people.
But the islands all have different geographies, sizes, amounts
of isolation, and food and mineral resources.
Therefore, the societies that developed had varied population sizes,
levels of organization, economies, and social complexity as a function
of differing geography.
Geography
Thus geography is a major player determining which societies
develop, expand, and which don't.
Chapter 3: Collision at Cajamarca
"The biggest population shift of modern times has been the colonization of the new World by Europeans, and the resulting conquest, numerical reduction , or complete disappearance of most groups of Native Americans".
Pizarro
The Incas were conquered by the Spaniard Francisco Pizarro. Pizarro
had 168 soldiers. They were in unfamiliar territory, ignorant of
the local inhabitants, were 1000 miles away from reinforcements, and were
and surrounded by the Incan empire with 80,000 soldiers led by Atahuallpa.
Guns, Germs and Steel
Pizarro, however, had steel armor and swords, horse mounted cavalry,
and guns (a minor factor).
Treachery
The account of the capture of Atahuallpa is one of the most difficult
passages you may ever read, due to the treachery employed by Pizarro, and
the religious justification used. Of course, we also know that Pizarro
collected a huge ransom for Atahuallpa in gold and silver, and then killed
him anyway.
Conquistadors
In addition to horses and steel, the conquistadors had superior ocean
going ships, superior political organization of the European states,
carried infectious diseases that wiped out 95% of Native Americans (smallpox,
measles, influenza, typhus, bubonic plague) and superior knowledge of human
behavior from thousands of years of written history. Pizarro got
his treacherous ideas from the experience of Cortez. The Incas knew
nothing of Spaniards.
Smallpox
Why not the other way?
Still, why was it that the Europeans had all of the advantages instead
of the Incas? Why didn't the Incas invent guns and steel swords,
have horses, or bear deadly diseases?