Kohlberg à 6 stages of moral development
|
1 |
punishment and obedience orientation |
“the carrot and the stick” |
|
2 |
instrumental relativist orientation |
will satisfy the needs of others as a means to her own ends |
|
3 |
interpersonal concordance orientation |
follows moral rules for social approval |
|
4 |
law and order orientation |
follows moral rules out of respect for authority and the law |
|
5 |
social contract legalistic orientation |
freedom as long as no harm is committed; utilitarian |
|
6 |
universal ethical principle orientation |
ruled by self legislated moral principles (justice); Kantian |
Within this theoretical framework:
The feminist worry with Kohlberg and others like him:
If we use men’s ethics as the yardstick for moral development, then we end up agreeing with the likes of Freud and concluding that women are not as morally developed as men.
Women are not less ethical than men are, women have a different stages of moral development and end up expressing a different sort of morality.
Developed her scale based on a study in which she interviewed 29 women who were making choices about whether or not to have an abortion.
|
1 |
Concern for self |
· Powerless · Eschews connection in favor of the safety of isolation |
|
2 |
Concern for others |
· Maintain personal connections · Focus on interests of others · Goodness equals self sacrifice · Many ‘traditional women’ find themselves living at this stage |
|
3 |
Balance concern for self and others |
· Maintains good relationships with self and others · Realize that she must care for self in order to care for others · Realize that caring for others can also count as caring for self |
So, is it better to hold and ethics of care or an ethics of justice (or, to be more blunt and less PC, which group is more ethical, men or women)?