INDEX A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Resource Management Model

Open Forum (first of three)

08-29-06 (90 minutes, approximately 70 people attended)

Issues brought forward during this open forum are grouped by whether they relate to the concept of the alternative budget model, how an alternative budget model would be implemented or if they are outside of the scope of a budget model.

Concept:

  • Weighting for colleges -- Human Sciences is .91 -- how does that reflect cost of education?
  • Revenue stream seems to stop at college level. Faith in college administration now, but that could change. Are colleges developing their own models? Seems transparency breaks down in how money follows student.
  • Off-campus, distance ed courses treated the same as on campus? If could do distance education course in Ankeny, could get 100%?
  • Transparency?
  • Centers or Institutes in previous model now College and Research Administration -- deliberate change?
  • Change?
  • Role of Faculty Senate in decision to be made?
  • Graduate college isn't with the other colleges. Why?
  • Charge back?

Implementation Issues/Technical to Budget Model:

  • See any details before approve budget model?
  • Cost of instruction? If have for instruction, maybe for other costs, like cost of buildings -- Insectary versus newer buildings.
  • Trust -- will do what they say and make decisions publicly available.
  • Motivation has to be made public
  • Transparency is relative term -- know result, maybe not how made. Make whole year 1 -- what happens in year 2?
  • Timing fiscal year, academic year? Rolling?
  • What happens if don't get nonreversion authority?
  • Graduate college $2 million versus graduate student tuition? Wants to hear explicit explanation.
  • Hard to see if in ag or other program, look what happened at USC -- if not collaborative then could start competing.
  • Make whole? Grants base, count as cost share on grant but what if goes away? Grant is 2-to-1 match.

Tangential -- Outside budget model but bought to light by it:

  • Impact on graduate education -- not ignored, but not pay for selves in tuition or research -- value of grants by faculty, justify on prestige, ability to attract quality faculty. Concern pressure of model is to underfund graduate education.
  • Quantity of graduate students in interdepartmental programs with emphasis on money to college, where's infrastructure? Now grad college and others.
  • Interdisciplinary programs: Had model up to early 90s, no budget until midyear because didn't get to it. Can't recruit unless understand financial future. Graduate recruitment in February for the following year.
  • Concern on interdisciplinary research -- will my dean allow people to do it, while NIH says need interdisciplinary to fund? Is my dean supporting me in interdisciplinary research?
  • Extension locations around university, don't know cost