Philosophy 230 B
The class beginning at
Review Sheet for Test #3
Basic Ideas: The Fill in the
Blank Section.
Know
Singer’s thesis statement. Know van den
Haag’s thesis statement. Know what
strict retributivism is. Know Pakaluk’s
thesis statement. Know Engel’s thesis
statement.
-Know
the Minimally Decent Human Argument for Famine Relief.
-Know
Singer’s Argument for famine relief.
-Know
how Singer’s Argument differs from the Minimally Decent Human Argument.
-Know
the difference between absolute poverty and relative poverty.
-Know
what the point of marginal utility is.
-Know
that ought implies can.
-Know
the Deterrence Argument for the Death Penalty.
-Know
what studies show about the death penalty deterring future murders.
-Know
van den Haag’s common sense defense of the deterrence argument.
-Know
the Strict Retributivist Argument for the Death
Penalty.
-Know
what a racist distribution is.
-Know
why van den Haag doesn’t think worries about racist distributions or worries
about executing innocent people undermine arguments for the death penalty.
Homosexual Rights—Pakaluk.
-Know
Pakaluk’s argument.
-Know
why he thinks laws against discrimination and gay marriage will cause a radical
change.
-Know
why he thinks laws against discrimination and gay marriage will effect everyone.
-Know
why he thinks laws against discrimination and gay marriage will undermine the
common good.
Animal Rights—Engel.
-Know
Engel’s Suffering Argument.
-Know
Engel’s Environment Argument.
-Know
how Engel’s argument is like the Minimally Decent Human Argument for Famine
Relief.
-Know
why Engel thinks that eating meat is not necessary.
Know
the 3 objections to Singer: 1) The
Overpopulation Objection, 2) The Locals First Objection, and 3) The Utilitarian
Objection. Know the 3 objections to
van den Haag: 1) The Burden of Proof
Objection, 2) The Deterrence Objection, and 3)
Famine Relief—Singer.
-All
3 objections to Singer are fair game here.
-Know
the response to worries of overpopulation.
-Know
the response to the locals first idea.
Death Penalty—van den Haag.
-All
3 objections to van den Haag are fair game here.
-Know
the response to
-Know
the four statement a potential murderer must believe
for the death penalty to deter.
Homosexual Rights—Pakaluk.
-The
objection to Pakaluk is fair game here.
-Know
the problems with why he thinks laws against discrimination and gay marriage
will cause a radical change.
-Know
the problems with why he thinks laws against discrimination and gay marriage
will effect everyone.
-Know
the problems with why he thinks laws against discrimination and gay marriage
will undermine the common good.
Animal Rights—Engel.
-The
objection to Engel is fair game here.
-Know
how Engel might respond to this objection.
Essay Question.
State
your standard for being a minimally decent person. Apply your standard to one
of issues we discussed in class.