Persuasive Speech Lecture Notes from
Friday October 13 and Wednesday October 18
Methods of Persuasion
Logos: Research and Reasoning
As for Structure Fun: From “Much Ado About Nothing”
DOGBERRY
Marry, sir, they have committed false
report;
moreover, they have spoken untruths;
secondarily, they are slanders; sixth and
lastly, they have belied a lady; thirdly,
They have verified unjust things; and, to
conclude, they are lying knaves.
Schedule of Important events
- Monday: LAB DAY; turn in the Analysis of the Persuasive Speech
Topic Form p. 46.
- Wednesday: Lecture Day; pulling the speech together and some
review
- Friday: Unit II Exam
- Review materials are available online at
- www.public.iastate.edu/~aslagell/spcm212/unit_II_review.html
- Then we are meeting in Labs for 2 ½ weeks.
- Workshop Days Oct. 25 or Nov. 1
Schedule of Outside Speeches
The New World of Water - Margaret Catley-Carlson
16 Oct 2006, 8:00 PM @ Sun Room, Memorial Union
Peace in Sudan? One Year After the Death of John Garang - Brian D'Silva
23 Oct 2006, 8:00 PM @ Gerdin Auditorium
Spirit and Food - Mary Swander
25 Oct 2006, 7:00 PM @ Great Hall, Memorial Union
The Global Economy – Senator Joseph Biden
31 Oct 2006, 8:00 PM @ Sun Room, Memorial Union
Global Justice and Human Rights - Trudy Rubin
01 Nov 2006, 8:00 PM @ Sun Room, Memorial Union
How to Make Your Vote Count - Ben [& Jerry’s] Cohen
02 Nov 2006, 8:00 PM @ Sun Room/South Ballroom, Memorial Union
Building A Persuasive Speech
- The Building Blocks
- Strong Analysis: Problem, Plan and Practicality
- Evidence / Supporting Material
- Statistics, Examples, Testimony using Ethos, Logos and Pathos
- Reasoning
- Principle
- Specific Instances [generalization]
- Analogy
- Causal
- Audience Connection
- With Content: Mental Dialogue
- With Structure
- With Delivery
Sample Speech: We watched a speech about Chewing Tobacco and
analyzed it.
INTRO
Attention—
detailed story of Tom
images
Credibility
I’m studying to be a dentist; dad is
I have seen it
Topic revealed
Relating to the audience
Example is a WI 23 year old? Fear
appeal?
Preview
The many problems resulting from
chewing tobacco.
Actions we can take to change the use of chewing tobacco.
Structure
I. Chewing tobacco
causes many serious problems.
A. Its use is widespread.
B. It causes problems such as tooth loss, gum disease and even death.
II. The problems of chewing tobacco can be solved by taking two
major steps.
A. Change Wisconsin laws to increase
the penalties and the enforcement for selling chewing tobacco to minors.
B. Ban use of chewing tobacco at professional sporting events.
Problem Issue
Its use is widespread.
The A.C.S. says
one in twelve Americans is a regular
user.
The average age of first use is 10.
40% of high school boys say they have tried it.
21% of kindergartners (boys?) have tried it.
It causes problems such as tooth loss,
gum disease and even death.
American Dental Association info on all
three problems
Extended example of Sean Marsee
Plan Issue
Change Wisconsin laws to increase the penalties and the enforcement for
selling chewing tobacco to minors.
WI Department of Law Enforcement
You can help by writing a letter asking for this law.
Ban use of chewing tobacco at professional sporting events.
You can help by writing a letter to your favorite team or athlete.
Practicality
Change laws
Laws must be enforced and have
penalties to be effective
California’s law is effective.
Evidence from: American Dental
Association
Change sports
Kid’s imitate role models; if they say
it is wrong, it’ll make a difference.
American Dental Association
Kansas City Royals has already banned
it.
Reasoning Process: Deduction and Induction.
Deduction refers to arguments that run from general to specific;
they
are characterized by necessity.
Induction refers to arguments that run from specific to general; they
are characterized by an inductive leap.
Classic form of Deduction: the syllogism
The U.S. Constitution guarantees citizens the right to
vote.
Women are
citizens
.
The U.S. Constitution guarantees women the right to vote.
A Current Deductive Argument about policy
Universities not in compliance with NCAA non-discrimination
policies should be shunned by other universities.
The University of Illinois
and The University of North Dakota are not in compliance with NCAA
non-discrimination policies.
The University of Illinois and The University of North Dakota should be
shunned by other universities.
2. More Typical form of Deduction is called the Enthymeme. It
works
like a syllogism but one of the premises is "assumed" rather than
stated.
Its strength comes, so some critics argue, from the belief that if the
audience supplies the missing premise, then they participate in their
own
persuasion.
Consider: what do you have to believe for these arguments to make
sense?
- She's a girl; she can't throw the ball.
- [assumes the listener will supply the principle that "girls
can't
throw"]
- He's a man, of course he wouldn't stop to ask directions.
- [assumes the listener will supply the principle that "men don't
ask for
directions.]
- The people of Iraq are intelligent people, they support Democracy.
- [assumes the listener will supply the principle that "all
intelligent people support Democracy."]
- 16 year olds have undeveloped brains so they can’t judge risks.
- People with undeveloped brains can’t judge risks.
- By writing a letter to your representative, you can help pass
this law.
- Writing letters leads to passing new laws.
- Because it is good for the environment all people should be using
ethanol fuel blends.
- [assumes the listener will supply the principle that "people
should always do what is good for the environment.]
- Gun registration will let the government know where the guns are,
so if
we support gun registration we are helping the government ban guns and
take them away.
- [Assumes the audience will supply the principle: "If the
government
knows
where guns are, they will eventually ban them and come take them away."]
Our text calls these arguments from principle.
To be effective a law must be enforced and have adequate
penalties.
Adopting my plan will make
Wisconsin’s laws on chewing tobacco be enforced and will create
adequate penalties.
Therefore, my plan will be effective at curbing chewing tobacco use.
Beware the false principle.
- The police say he committed the crime, so he committed the crime.
- stereotypes
- starting from principles that only those who already agree with
you
would
maintain.
The major form of Inductive reasoning our text calls argument
from
specific instances.
Otherwise known as generalization arguments.
- Surveys and studies are often grounded in reasoning from specific
instances.
- Neilson ratings
- Very Useful for Proving there is a Problem
Specific Instances: Chewing Tobacco Speech
- “Chewing tobacco use is widespread.”
- The A.C.S. says one in twelve Americans is a regular user.
- The average age of first use is 10.
- 40% of high school boys say they have tried it.
- 21% of kindergartners (boys?) have tried it.
Specific Instances: Teen Driving Speech
- There are too many car accidents, death and injuries involving
teen drivers.
- National Hwy Safety Administration Info
- 7 % of drivers, but are 14% of fatalities
- 3,657 teen drivers killed last year
- 2,384 teen passengers killed
- 2, 625 21 and older killed in accidents with teen drivers
- Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
- Teens have highest % of crashes caused by speeding, and
driver error and the most single car crashes
- USA Today says 16 yr olds are 3 times more likely to be in a
fatal crash than older drivers.
Generalization in the self-defense speech
- College students are especially easy targets for crime.
- Evidence from Street Wisdom for Women.
- Alcohol use and crime
- campus areas are often the highest crime districts of their
communities
Beware the Hasty Generalization
- In a random poll taken last month of 320 members of the American
Association
of Retired Persons, 96 percent of those interviewed clearly opposed any
major changes in the Social Security system. Clearly, then, the
American
People oppose such changes. [weak because of bias and so you
can't
generalize to the population as a whole].
- the two people I sat next to in lecture got Bs on their speeches,
so
everybody
but me got a B on the speech.
- “but Mom, everybody else is going to the party!”
This is as far as we got
on Friday, so we picked up here on Wednesday, October 18
Arguments from Analogy: Literal or Figurative
Both are grounded in the concept of similarity
Examples of Literal Analogies
- Socialized medicine works in Canada, so socialized medicine will
work
in
the U.S.
- The U.S. got rid of the half-penny in 1857 without causing harms,
so
today
we can get rid of the penny without causing harms.
- A self-defense course made me able to defend myself; it will make
you
able
to defend yourself.
Analogies can help prove practicality as in the Chewing Tobacco Speech
- It worked in California, so it can work in Wisconsin.
- Good evidence to show that the law is working in California
- Some sense of similarity between California and Wisconsin helps
it work.
- Kansas City Royals have banned its use so other teams might too.
Weak Analogies?
- The university shouldn't be able to tell me what classes I have
to
take;
after all, the store manager doesn't tell me what groceries to buy.
- A ban on all alcohol use in the dorms will work at ISU because
such a
ban
worked at Luther College.
- We praise the lives of soldiers who sacrificed their lives for
the sake
of others, why can’t we celebrate embryos sacrificed in order to save
the lives of others?
- Banning guns worked in Japan, so it will work here.
Figurative Analogies can be useful for framing an argument, but they
don't
constitute proof.
- Essentially a simile, but can be useful for framing an argument
- Not useful as proof/evidence
- It is typically heard as pathos not logos
- Figurative Analogy Example:
Malcolm X on integrating the
Civil Rights Movement
"It’s just like when you’ve got some coffee that’s too black,
which
means it’s too strong. What do you do? You integrate it with cream, you
make it weak. But if you pour too much cream in it, you won’t even know
you ever had coffee. It used to be hot, it becomes cool. It used to be
strong, it becomes weak. It used to wake you up, now it puts you to
sleep."
"Message to the Grass Roots," speech, Nov. 1963, Detroit (published in
Malcolm X Speaks, ch. 1, 1965).
Causal Arguments
The most challenging of the types of reasoning.
We cant see causal relationships, we can only infer them.
- Examples
- cigarettes cause lung cancer
- Dry Veishea causes off campus trouble
Problems of Causal Arguments
- “post hoc ergo propter hoc” = “after this therefore because of
this”
- confusing a relationship in time with cause and effect
- seen in superstitions
- seen in “just look what happened after we . . . . “ arguments.
- multiple causation
- rain forest destruction is the cause of global warming
- T.V. is responsible for school gun violence.
- my printer problem caused me to be unable to do my speech
- correlation vs. causation
Tips for success in causal reasoning.
- use causal chains to help the audience see the causal
relationship.
- use testimony of experts to support conclusions
The textbook also discusses several additional types of fallacies
including:
slippery slope, red herring, Either-Or fallacy, ad hominem, and
bandwagon.
Read that discussion for more information.
Looking
For Reasoning in The Boating and Drinking Text
I. Reasoning in Boating and Drinking.
A. Specific Instances reasoning in Boating
and Drinking
Drinking and boating is a serious problem is the
generalization
claim proven by the evidence:
the example on Fox Lake
Statistics from the National Safety Council
Ranking from the U.S. Department of Transportation
WI State Center for Health Statistics
the U.S Coast Guard
the National Transportation Safety Board
B. Causal Argument Examples
“boater’s hypnosis” causes you to become impaired from
alcohol
use more quickly.
drinking while driving a boat is legal and causes accidents and
fatalities.
C. Argument from analogy
driving a car = driving a boat
It is illegal to drink while driving a car, it should be
illegal
to drink while driving a boat.
Driving a boat while drinking is even worse than driving a car: [a
fortiori
argument]
Boats go faster
Boats are harder to stop
Boater’s hypnosis makes driver impairment even worse on a boat.
D. Boating and Drinking Plan has an argument from
Principle.
My plan is to require boater safety education.
Mandatory boater education will result in safer behaviors on the
waterways.
What must I believe for that argument to work?
Having information about a safety issue will result in safer behaviors.
Full structure of the syllogism is:
Having information about safety on the waterways will
result
in safer behaviors.
My plan will require that boaters get safety information.
Therefore, my plan will result in safer behaviors on the waterways.
Sample Speech: “The Problem With Pennies” [go here to read the entire sample
speech]
- Specific Purpose: To persuade my audience that pennies
should be
eliminated from the United States money supply.
- Central Idea: Because Pennies cause problems for
individuals, businesses,
and the economy as a whole, they should be eliminated from the U.S.
money
system.
Pattern of Organization: Problem - Solution
I. Pennies cause serious problems for individuals, businesses and the
national economy.
A. Pennies are a nuisance for
individuals. [class survey, U.S. Mint
Survey, example of Noel Gunther from the L.A. Times]
B. Pennies are a nuisance for businesses too. [Fortune magazine,
National Association of Convenience Stores]
C. Pennies are a nuisance for the nation. [stats and testimony
from
the Treasury Dept., from the U.S. Mint, from U.S. News and World
Report]
II. The federal government should eliminate pennies from the money
supply.
A. First step is for the federal
government to legalize and standardize
rounding off purchases to the nearest nickel.
1. Explain the plan.
2. Support Practicality: Rounding off purchases: would not cause
increased cost to consumers.
B. The next step is to round the sales tax off to the nearest nickel.
1. Explain the plan
2. Support Practicality: Rounding off sales tax: again, no increased
cost; it is like rounding
off to the nearest dollar on your income tax return.
C. The third step is for the Mint to stop making pennies.
1. Explain the plan step.
2. Support Practicality: Stop minting: this will save $80 million a
year.
D. The fourth step is for people to cash in their pennies removing
them
from the money supply.
1. Support Practicality: Such a plan
has worked in the U.S. before; in 1857 we eliminated the
half-penny.
2. Support Practicality: We already practice this plan through the
"Leave a Penny, Take a Penny"
dishes at check-out counters.
Argument analysis Problem with Pennies:
The following is an example of what pattern of reasoning?
Pennies
are a costly nuisance for the business community.The National
Association of Convenience
Stores estimates that an average of two seconds is spent handling
pennies
during each of its members’ 10 billion annual cash transactions. That
comes out
to a total of 5.5 million hours spent handling pennies—at an annual
cost of $22
million. According to Fortune
magazine, some banks charge up to 30 cents for every dollar’s worth of
pennies
they process.
The following is an example of what pattern of reasoning?
"When the U.S.
stopped minting half-cent
coins in 1857, a similar procedure of rounding off purchases and
phasing out
the coins worked extremely well. None of us miss the half-cent, and in
a few
years none of us will miss the penny."
The following is an example of what pattern of reasoning?
Outdated products that create problems for individuals, for
businesses and for the nation as a whole should be eliminated.
Since Pennies create serious problems at all three levels, the penny
should be eliminated from our economy.
The following is an example of what pattern of reasoning?
Rounding off the sales tax to the nearest nickel on purchases won't
increase the taxes you pay, just like rounding off your income to the
nearest dollar when you file income taxes doesn't increase your taxes.
Check your work
Remember: Successful Speeches do not rely on reasoning [Logos] alone
Be sure to incorporate Ethos and Pathos
throughout your Speech too [see the Special Olympics speech pp. 460-462
in the textbook as an example]
ETHOS: Building credibility throughout
your
speech
- Announce your expertise
- in the introduction
- as you cite sources
- Announce your concern
- Build Common Ground with your audience
- demonstrate concern for their interests and needs
- use shared principles (values, beliefs, attitudes) to build
your
arguments
- Deliver your speech fluently, expressively and with conviction
Pathos: Building Emotional Appeals Throughout your
Speech
- Use emotional language
- concrete terms
- stylistic devices
- Develop vivid examples
- Speak with sincerity and conviction
- Use emotional appeals hand in hand with your evidence and
reasoning
Exam Review: Practice Identifying Reasoning
Can you identify the kind or reasoning and or the fallacy in the
following
examples?
Once you have tried to answer these on your own you can go
here for answers and discussion.
1. According to a study by the American Medical
Association,
men with bald spots have three times the risk of heart attack as men
with
a full head of hair. Strange as it may seem, it looks as if
baldness
is a cause of heart attacks.
2. The U.S. Constitution guarantees all citizens the right to bear
arms.
Gun control legislation infringes on the right of citizens to bear
arms.
Therefore, gun control legislation is contrary to the Constitution.
3. I don’t see any reason to wear a helmet when I ride a
bike.
Everyone bikes without a helmet.
4. It’s ridiculous to worry about protecting America’s
national
parks against pollution and overuse when innocent people are being
killed
by domestic terrorists.
5. There can be no doubt that the Great Depression was
caused
by Herbert Hoover. He became President in March 1929, and the
stock
market crashed just seven months later.
6. If we allow the school board to spend money remodeling the
gymnasium,
next they will want to build a new school and give all the teachers a
huge
raise. Taxes will soar so high that businesses will leave and
then
there will be no jobs for anyone in this town.
7. Raising a child is like having a pet--you need to feed it, play
with
it, and everything
will be fine.
8. One nonsmoker, interviewed at a restaurant, said, “I can eat
dinner
just fine even though people around me are smoking.” Another,
responding
to a Los Angeles Times survey, said, “I don’t see what all the fuss is
about. My wife has smoked for years and it has never
bothered
me.” We can see, then, that secondhand smoke does not cause a
problem
for most nonsmokers.
9. I can’t support Representative Frey’s proposal for campaign
finance
reform. After all, he was kicked out of law school for cheating
on
an exam.
10. Our school must either increase tuition or cut back on library
services
for students.
