| | Sitemap | Feedback | | ||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
|
Core Component 2c ISU’s ongoing evaluation and assessment processes provide reliable evidence of institutional effectiveness that clearly informs strategies for continuous improvement. |
||||||
| The Future > Evaluation > Progress Reports | ||||||
2.4.2 Strategic Plan Progress Reports |
||||||
|
Iowa State’s current annual report to the Board of Regents includes an assessment of progress on 31 performance indicators. Included among those are: • One-year undergraduate persistence rate As a subset of the overall measures of progress, a set of key benchmark measures serve to assess Iowa State’s progress on competitiveness with peer institutions. These benchmark measures represent various characteristics of the nation’s major land-grant universities, and have been developed with significant input from a representative group of institutions belonging to the National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges (NASULGC). Performance indicators for the 2005-2010 Strategic Plan have been adjusted to include: 1. Total Enrollment Measures 1-4 relate to all strategic plan priority areas and goals. The next eight measures (5-12) focus on education, the first priority area of the University’s new strategic plan. They provide a measure of the institution’s progress in strengthening undergraduate, graduate, and professional education to enhance student success at Iowa State and beyond. Items 9-12 as well as item 19 are from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSEE), which annually assesses the extent to which undergraduate students are involved in educational practices empirically linked to high levels of learning and development. Indicators 13-16 relate to the University’s goal of increasing the number of graduate, professional, and research programs ranked among the nation’s best, and 17 and 18 measure the University’s impact on state economy. The final two indicators assess the quality of the University as a place to learn and work. Benchmarking enables the institution to monitor progress and effectiveness in key areas and, in areas where progress is not evident, serves as a catalyst for improvement. The institution periodically evaluates these benchmarks, and, when appropriate, suggests additions or adjustments, particularly when a new Strategic Plan calls for such a change. Next Section: 2.4.3 Academic and Non-academic Program Reviews >>
|
||||||
| Overview | Mission & Integrity | The Future | Learning & Teaching | Knowledge | Engagement & Service | |
||||||
|
|
||||||