| | Sitemap | Feedback | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overview > 2006 Review > Accreditation & Planning | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0.3.2 Accreditation & Planning |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This self-study was developed concurrently with the University’s 2005-2010 Strategic Plan, thus enabling the University to leverage the environmental scan, constituent feedback, and focus group results. The Office of the Provost provided oversight in developing both documents, which enhanced communication between the groups. In addition, committee membership overlapped significantly. Because the University community was actively and deeply engaged in the strategic planning process, awareness, understanding, and support for the goals articulated in the strategic plan was forthcoming. As a part of the University’s planning process, various units engaged in self-study, reflected on accomplishments, and made plans for the future. Preliminary work defining the scope and format of the self study began in Spring 2004, and the steering committee was named and first convened in July 2004. The committee met monthly to prepare the self-study, discuss strategies for gathering feedback, and support preparation of the accreditation site-visit. Responsibility for sections of the self study was divided between the 16 member team. The web-based format served both to provide a mechanism for sharing within the committee but also a means by which the larger university community could review and comment on the progress. The preliminary draft of the self study was posted on the web in March for committee review. After modifications, the University community was invited to comment on the first draft in April 2005. The second draft was prepared in response to comments and suggestions and was posted for university wide review in August 2005. The remainder of the time before submission was spent updating content, responding to feedback, checking links and compiling a hard copy.
The steering committee for the self-study was composed of representatives from most colleges and units. • David Acker, College of Agriculture Additionally, secondary contacts within each college and unit were named as “Accreditation Coordinators” Communication with Constituencies Constituents were encoraged to provide input via their home colleges, the various steering committee members, and via direct review and commentary on the several web-based draft versions of the self-study. Such input was received continuously over the period of self-study preparation. To collect input from various constituencies, several campus groups were given presentations about the process and the self−study including: PAC (Provost’s Academic Cabinet) Because the strategic planning and self-study processes are closely related, the environmental scan, constituent feedback, and focus groups conducted as part of the strategic planning process also provided primary input for the self-study in ways more normally accomplished as the first phase of the self-study. In addition to presentations, information regarding the accreditation process and the self-study was shared through the student newspaper and the faculty/staff newsletter. These articles invited the community to review the self-study and to provide comments to the steering committee. Inside Iowa State Article Inside Iowa State Article Inside Iowa State Update Iowa State Daily Article Iowa State Daily Article Iowa State Daily Article Next Section: 0.3.3 Goals for the 2006 Accreditation Review >>
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overview | Mission & Integrity | The Future | Learning & Teaching | Knowledge | Engagement & Service | |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||